Are Security Cameras an Invasion of Privacy

In public surveillance cameras good or bad debate, the first question is whether the surveillance cameras an invasion of privacy.

37% say yes and 67% say no, according to the debeate.org in the security cameras and privacy discussion.

When you are walking down the street, driving in your car, or hanging out with boyfriends and girlfriends, you will be monitored with cameras placed in public. This creates a complete picture of the private life of an individual. We all have private life, which doesn’t want others or the government to know.

Yet, the public surveillance does help with investigation and protect us. There are no laws that prohibit surveillance cameras in public places. And more than half of the reviewed citizens think that cameras would not be an invasion of privacy if they were put in places that are not private, like in the parking lots or in business.


Pros of Surveillance Cameras in Public Places

Why are the benefits of surveillance cameras in public places? Here list several advantages of why we need public surveillance.
Pro 1. Public Video Surveillance Improves Public Safety

When we install a home security camera, we gain increased house safety. Just like that, the main benefit of surveillance cameras in public spaces is also the increase of public safety. Public surveillance cameras help you stay safe while clubbing, shopping, and travelling.

The public security cameras can be used as a way to keep an eye out for any crimes that are being committed. PTZ security cameras put in public spaces, like a crossroad, a retail store, parking lots, museums, concert halls, do an excellent job in providing 360° seamless surveillance solutions.

Additionally, crimes can be deterred before they even begin in some cases. If a suspicious individual or individuals or items are seen in an area, the appropriate authorities can be contacted to move into the area before any damage is done or any crime is committed. Moreover, any people in the area can be cleared as a precaution.

Since public safety is guaranteed, people’s fear of crime can also be reduced, while their sense of security is created.


Pro 2. Public Surveillance Cameras Reduce Crime Rate

Video surveillance statistics show that camera surveillance does reduce crime. According to it, crime incidents in Humboldt Park dropped 20% after the cameras were put in public.

If an individual knows that there are live surveillance cameras in a certain area, they may be less willing to commit a crime near the location for the fear of being caught.

Some authorities place public cameras in Walmart and other shops, hoping that the cameras will help prevent crimes from being committed.


Pro 3. Public Video Surveillance Helps Catch Criminals

If a crime is committed in an area where a public surveillance camera has been set up, the chances of catching the criminal are much higher.

Facial recognition software has improved greatly over the years, which means that if a person is caught on camera committing a crime, the chances of them being caught is much higher. Posters can be created and the images can be aired on network television to help spread the word about the criminal.

Without the surveillance cameras in public places, it can be extremely difficult to gain a quality description of the person who committed the crime, even if there were eye witnesses.

Catching criminals is one the best benefits of surveillance cameras in public places. The bombing at Boston Marathon is a good example. It only took the FBI three days to release blurry shots of the two suspects, taken by a surveillance camera installed in a department store.


Pro 4. Video Cameras in Public Locations Provide Evidence and Gather Clues

Another benefit of surveillance is that any footage that captures a crime being committed can be used in a court of law as evidence against the accused.

In some cases, if there were no CCTV security camera systems in public places, there would be little or no evidence to convict the person of the crime and the individual may go free. Those night vision security cameras feature good and long range of night vision, so that robbers can be recognized even if they commit a crime in dark areas.

Additionally, in some cases the public video surveillance footage can also help prove someone’s innocence if they have been accused of a crime that they did not commit.


Pro 5. Public Video Surveillance Improves Convenience for Everyday Life

There are also some cities that have placed cameras on stop lights as a way to help prevent people from speeding or from going through a red light.

And also, relevant authorities can monitor road conditions with the live surveillance cameras. So they can make real-time traffic reports, helping people choose the right time and road when going out.


Cons of Security Cameras in Public Places

While there are advantages of CCTV, there are disadvantages.

What’s wrong with public video surveillance? Here are some bad points of public CCTV cameras.
Con 1. Surveillance Systems are Easily Abuse

Some essays discussing surveillance cameras in public places show that the cameras may be abused. One example of how a public camera may be misused is that, information gathered by law enforcement can be used as a form of blackmail.

Another form of abuse is voyeurism. Spying on women using public surveillance cameras is quite common in areas where these cameras have been set up. This can become quite an issue that needs to be dealt with.

Overall, the simple lack of control or limits on the public camera use is one of the biggest problems. Until now, there is not a good check-and-balance system, in order to prevent abuses from occurring.


Con 2. Effectiveness of a Public Security Camera Is Doubted

Another controversy of the use of surveillance cameras in public places is that its effectiveness has not been proven. While there has been a push for more public CCTV cameras to be placed in public places because of the threat of terrorist attacks, it is quite clear that a suicidal bomber is not going to be deterred by the fact that there is a camera in place.


Con 3. Public Camera Surveillance is Expensive

One of the arguments against the widely use of public surveillance cameras is that it costs big money. Since it is not effective enough to deter crimes and theft, why would we spend too much money in it, which not only fails to make us safer, but also violates our personal rights?


Conclusion of Installing Public Surveillance Cameras

In today’s world public cameras can be extremely helpful.

After the Orlando nightclub shooting, how to stay safe in public places, say, a night club, has been raising more concerns. Needless to say, placing cameras in strategic areas throughout a city can help ensure public safety, protect property, and prevent crimes.

But on the other hand, there are always crimes which are not deterred by surveillance cameras. And the abuse of public video cameras would violate privacy and personal rights. Therefore, how to balance public safety and personal privacy needs to be considered further.

As far as I am concerned, benefits of surveillance outweigh the disadvantages greatly.

According to FBI statistics on surveillance cameras, there were an estimated 1,165,383 violent crimes 8,277,829 property crimes reported in 2014, and the crime rate has been rising in recent years.

I can’t imagine how bad the situation would be if there were no public security cameras. There is no much about the concern of privacy violation when you behave yourself in public places. Security in public places should always be put on the top of priority.

Original Post

Add Reply

×
×
×
×